Having looked through our previous fragment we’re surprised to find that our meditations of the alcoholism nature again come to the question of the meaning of life. We’ve to start again from this point to another direction. The involvement of the sense of life category is an ordinary thing for a philosopher; any choice is admissible. In the broad field of the philosophy the meaning of life is an undefined quantity. Moreover, it can be described as a set with an infinite number of values. However, if in philosophy one can write treatises of hundreds of thousands of words, in practical life including the applied love of wisdom we face natural limitations. Ancient Greek sophists were probably first coaches in European history. They earned their living not by abstract reflections but by training their customers of effective behavior in the political system of the Ancient Greece, and in this framework were to represent that in the most important in life and what is less. Thus, the concept of hedonism was born and is still actively used in modern psychology. The stoic ethics can be a prototype of the idea that a human acts to support his or her own homeostasis. Considering the basic principles of our project of the philosophy of alcohol addiction and judging on our own beliefs, we propose the human dignity maintenance model as an alternative to the drug degradation. This quite briefly described level of the meaning of life can be the upper limit of the human behavior explanation model, which lower limit goes into behaviorism. Indeed, a human isn’t a machine, which can be explained by such simple example that our reactions to the same challenges from inside or from outside will never be the same. That’s why we can make algorithms to try to explain animal behavior while such algorithms for human existence in most cases turns into complex and multivalued type of a philosophic theory.