Until recently in our evolutionary history, addictive agents have been ingested in foods. Many are secondary plant metabolites that evolved because they discourage ingestion by animals1. The hungers that arise from bodily needs are non-directive; they merely encourage us to put things in our mouth. The more acute the hunger, the greater the range of substances we will ingest2. We learn to return to the yellow banana, the purple fig, the pink peach. We also learn to chew the tobacco leaf and drink the nectar of fermented fruits and grains. Because of the need for the nutrients in plants containing addictive substances, many species have learned to accept mildly intoxicating amounts of these compounds. Paradoxically, some of the poisons that evolved in plants to discourage animals from returning are—like the nutrients that the plants offer—habitforming in their own right. Addiction and obesity each results from foraging and ingestion habits that persist and strengthen despite the threat of catastrophic consequences. Feeding and drug use involve learned habits and preferences that are stamped in by the reinforcing properties of powerful and repetitive rewards. Palatable food activates brain reward circuitry through fast sensory inputs and through slow postingestive consequences (such as raising glucose concentration in blood and brain), whereas drugs activate these same pathways mostly through their direct pharmacological effects on the reward circuitry.
Publication bibliography
Volkow, Nora D.; Wise, Roy A. (2005): How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? In Nature neuroscience 8 (5), pp. 555–560. DOI: 10.1038/nn1452.

