cognitive activity sphere

However, the question of cogito as both first elements and the primary precondition of obtaining knowledge about the world isn’t limited in its meaning to cognitive activity sphere only.  When capability issue is investigated, for example, the question is if the human can control his or her affects and, what’s more, their consequences. In fact, using the concept of cogito, we can talk about its absence (in the case of, for example, mental retardation), or its improper functioning (as it’s sometimes interpreted specifically with respect of schizophrenia or autism).We can go even further in here. We can introduce the concept of the human will and even speak of the criteria of the will weakness. It won’t be too simple to view cogito cybernetically. If we consider the human brain similar to a supercomputer and assume that a newborn’s cogito works at the initial level of human development, the enculturation, socialization and education can be represented as a gradual complication of the cogito program. This process results in two interrelated consequences. Firstly, a person’s ability to act like other adult members of the same community. Secondly, the advent of the responsibility of a person for his or her actions. Even at such deep level of the mind, the human’s control over himself (herself) is subjective only in form. Like in the case of the cognitive activity when we come to a truth through some logical forms, knowledge and skills we’ve obtained, our cogito largely depends on the character and the way of acquiring social models rather than just on neurostructures containing relevant information. But speaking about cogito we face another problem. From the viewpoint of modern philosophical phenomenology and many branches of psychology (especially psychoanalysis), the assertion that the mind has the absolute power in the vast internal world of a human isn’t doubtless. As an example of that, we’re going to give unconscious quola in our following fragments.