Such concepts can be drawn from some philosophically-minded psychologists and psychiatrists who explain the origin of schizophrenia with the minimal cogito concept. It shall be noted that the programming code of cogito can be accessed by external social experience together with multiple internal structure of the mind. Thus, in most cases, talking about the human self we mean we’re dealing with narrative cogito, that can be viewed as an independent phenomenon provided we use classical dialectic categories. On the one hand, it always contains a certain image of human experience. On the other hand, it has the potential of an individual interpretation of this experience. Even in the ancient world they used to compare the human internal environment with the social structures outside the human. It is the root of the dichotomy of microcosm and macrocosm that are similar in structure and functions, but not the same. Our story, living in the structure of the self, gives us the sense of the past, determines our ability to predict the future, and allows us to compare ourselves with others. Moreover, it’s the embedded social programs that help us act that is become a part of a big social organism. Contrariwise, the achievements in philosophy and psychology we’ve now suggest that this social self is, perhaps the most significant part, although not the single one, of a complex set called the human consciousness. Even philosophically speaking the rationalism explaining everything from the reason’s point of view has never been the only view of the subjective reality. The irrationalism’s always been the opposite of the rationalism. When irrationalists describe a human being they take intuition of indivisible human experience as a leading power of the person.