Does narrative cogito fully control the addictive process?

Thus, we modify somehow the question of control that is a key question for the study of the alcohol addiction. Let’s put it this way: Does narrative cogito fully control the addictive process of the impact on the reward center or not? Remember the answer here can be as hypothetical as any other alternative. To explore the direction further we shall point out the key elements of the above-mentioned human body control center complex. Scientifically speaking we twisted the logic of the previous fragment by introducing the idea of the narrative cogito without discussing the basic notion which subcategory this idea is. We can find an excuse that we did it following the historical tradition. Indeed, it was narrative cogito that Descartes and his followers put into the center of their attention. Though, they didn’t use the term. As a matter of fact, cogito phenomenology does have a final “human” area in the depth of our brains. This area can lose every other characteristics, but one –to be an element of the communication environment. Philosophically, we, can like Husserl leave every element of a human’s knowledge aside to get the extreme point of the human’s communicative activity. It’s important for us that the rational tradition we speak about had of a mentally healthy person as its ideal. Moreover, the person had to be intellectually developed. To be a scientist, a philosopher, an inventor solving difficult heuristic problems. Nevertheless, if we try to build a model of cogito on the basis of experience in psychiatry, we can result in having a completely different model based on minimal or elementary cogito. If we resort to the trending language of cybernetics, we can speak of a structure with no initial software installed.