The Addiction Philosophy Map
<< < January 2017 > >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

However, the wish to find a global force that may help us overcome a galloping addictive desire bumps into an unexpected obstacle, a purely philosophic one. There can be no force like that at all. We live in a world where the life order is a patchwork. Indeed, the mass public no longer takes such things as life aims, a personal devotion mission as imperatives for themselves. It’s a rule, not an exception when a person can quit his or her job that brings no more moral or material satisfaction and almost never feel sorry about it. The clearest description of this spirit of the public life was given by postmodernism philosophy of the 60s.

 

Within the goal-setting conditions,  subjects adopted either distal goals defined in terms of weekly goal  limits or proximal goals specifying the goal limits for each of four time  periods during each day. Goal setting enhanced self-directed change as measured  by reductions in both eating behavior and weight. The higher the goal  attainments, the greater were the losses in weight. Proximal and distal goal  setting yielded comparable overall results because the majority of subjects  assigned remote goals altered this condition by adopting proximal goals to  augment control over their own behavior.

Read more
Kalivas, PETER W., and Nora D. Volkow. 2005. “The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice.” The American Journal of Psychiatry 162 (8): 1403–13. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403.